dblaikie added a comment. In D83088#2213797 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D83088#2213797>, @nhaehnle wrote:
> In D83088#2208611 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D83088#2208611>, @dblaikie wrote: > >> This seems like a strange hybrid between a static-polymorphism (with traits) >> and dynamic polymorphism (with base classes/virtual functions). Could this >> more readily be just one or the other? (sounds like you're leaning towards >> dynamic polymorphism) > > No, it's very much this way on purpose. The idea is to support the same set > of functionality as much as possible in both static **and** dynamic > polymorphism. Could it be implemented statically as a primary interface, with a dynamic wrapper? (eg: a base class, then a derived class template that takes the static CFG type to wrap into the dynamic type) keeping the two concepts more clearly separated? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D83088/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D83088 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
