yaxunl added a comment. In D84068#2208394 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D84068#2208394>, @arsenm wrote:
>> > > Long term, I'd rather aim for merging rocm-device-libs into libclc and making > it an llvm project. They're largely forks of the same original sources from > about 5 years ago, and it's an unfortunate split of effort. I also > specifically do not want distros to be shuffling this around, and want it to > behave exactly like compiler-rt. As far as I can tell cuda clang does not > actually work with the Ubuntu packaged cuda, which arbitrarily moved the nvvm > binaries, and I don't really want a repeat of this situation. I also do want > the device libs build to support a non-rocm package to install to a standard > distro clang package, which is different than the rocm libraries trying to > support every clang in the universe. Ideally just a regular clang works > without any formal rocm installation. I like the idea of making rocm-device-libs part of llvm-projects, but I think rocm-device-libs is not an OpenCL device library. That said, before rocm-device-library become part of llvm-project, we need to support rocm-device-library at other locations. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D84068/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D84068 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
