ZhangKang added a comment. In D85599#2206033 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D85599#2206033>, @efriedma wrote:
> Fixing a MachineVerifier issue by patching clang is generally wrong; if the > IR is valid, the backend should do something sane with it. If the IR isn't > valid, the IR Verifier should complain. > > Here, I'd say the IR is valid; adding a special case to the IR rules here > would be a pain. So the right fix involves changing isel and/or the > definitions of the the instructions in question. Yes, after the TRAP has been handled, the program should be continued. So I have removed the isTerminator for TRAP on PPC. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D85599/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D85599 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
