On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 6:26 PM Hiroshi Yamauchi via llvm-commits <llvm-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:30 AM Hans Wennborg via Phabricator > <revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> hans added a comment. >> >> In D84782#2191429 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D84782#2191429>, @yamauchi wrote: >> >> > In D84782#2191243 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D84782#2191243>, @MaskRay >> > wrote: >> > >> >> @yamauchi Do we need cd890944ad344b1b8cac58332ab11c9eec6b61e9 >> >> <https://reviews.llvm.org/rGcd890944ad344b1b8cac58332ab11c9eec6b61e9> and >> >> 3d6f53018f845e893ad34f64ff2851a2e5c3ba1d >> >> <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG3d6f53018f845e893ad34f64ff2851a2e5c3ba1d> in >> >> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/tree/release/11.x ? >> > >> > I think it'd be good to have them, if possible, though it's a latent, >> > non-recent bug. >> >> They're hard to apply without 50da55a58534e9207d8d5e31c8b4b5cf0c624175 >> <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG50da55a58534e9207d8d5e31c8b4b5cf0c624175>. Do >> you think we should take that also? Or maybe this can wait since it's not a >> new bug. > > > 50da55a58534e9207d8d5e31c8b4b5cf0c624175 isn't a bug fix but it's not > changing the default behavior. So, it is probably safe to take it. That said, > I'd say this can wait unless there's some immediate issue, since it's not a > new bug.
Okay, let's not worry about it for 11.x then. Thanks, Hans _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
