steakhal added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CStringChecker/CStringLength.h:43 + ProgramStateRef &State, const Expr *Ex, + SVal Buf, bool Hypothetical = false); + ---------------- steakhal wrote: > steakhal wrote: > > balazske wrote: > > > I do not like that the //get// and //set// (CStringLength) functions are > > > not symmetrical. I (and other developers) would think that the get > > > function returns a stored value and the set function sets it. The > > > `getCStringLength` is more a `computeCStringLength` and additionally may > > > manipulate the `State` too. In this form it is usable mostly only for > > > CStringChecker. (A separate function to get the value stored in the > > > length map should exist instead of this `Hypothetical` thing.) > > > [...] get function returns a stored value and the set function sets it. > > Certainly a burden to understand. It would be more appealing, but more > > useful? > > The user would have to check and create if necessary regardless. So fusing > > these two functions is more like a feature. > > What use case do you think of using only the query function? In other > > words, how can you guarantee that you will find a length for a symbol? > > > > > In this form it is usable mostly only for CStringChecker. (A separate > > > function to get the value stored in the length map should exist instead > > > of this Hypothetical thing.) > > You are right. However, I want to focus on splitting parts without > > modifying the already existing API reducing the risk of breaking things. > > You should expect such a change in an upcoming patch. > On second thought, It probably worth having a cleaner API to a slight > inconvenience. If he feels like, still can wrap them. > I will investigate it tomorrow. I made a separate patch for cleansing this API. In the D84979 now these API functions will behave as expected. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D84316/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D84316 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits