yamauchi added inline comments.
================
Comment at:
llvm/test/Transforms/PGOProfile/Inputs/multiple_hash_profile.proftext:20
18
12
----------------
davidxl wrote:
> nit: change 12 to a different value say 6.(otherwise if the option is an nop,
> the test will still succeed).
Done.
================
Comment at: llvm/test/Transforms/PGOProfile/multiple_hash_profile.ll:3
; RUN: opt < %s -pgo-instr-use -pgo-test-profile-file=%t.profdata -S |
FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -pgo-instr-use -pgo-test-profile-file=%t.profdata
-pgo-instr-old-cfg-hashing=true -S | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -passes=pgo-instr-use -pgo-test-profile-file=%t.profdata -S |
FileCheck %s
----------------
davidxl wrote:
> Use a different prefix like CHECKOLD
Done.
================
Comment at: llvm/test/Transforms/PGOProfile/multiple_hash_profile.ll:33
; CHECK-SAME: !prof ![[BW:[0-9]+]]
; CHECK: ![[BW]] = !{!"branch_weights", i32 12, i32 6}
%retval.0.i = mul nsw i32 %mul.i, %i
----------------
davidxl wrote:
> CHECKOLD expects a different weight.
Done.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D84782/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D84782
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
