dyung added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D18708#390166, @rsmith wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D18708#390150, @dyung wrote: > > > From my understanding, there are 2 issues that block us. The first is that > > we currently do not ship all of the header files for C11. The second is > > that we do not yet fully have C11 library support yet for our platform. > > > How do things go wrong if Clang is used in C11 mode against a C99 library? Do > you have code that conditionally uses C11 library features if they're > available? (And thanks for explaining, by the way; this is useful information > for when we next consider changing the default language mode -- we'll likely > be changing the default C++ language mode soon.) > > Anyway, it seems reasonable for the PS4 toolchain to control its defaults > here, and the patch itself LGTM. My understanding is that we currently do not ship all of the headers required for C11, so if users tried to use anything from those, they would be unable to do so. I am also under the impression that C11 requires some library support which we do not yet provide. Thanks for the quick review! http://reviews.llvm.org/D18708 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
