hans added a comment.

In D84244#2167602 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D84244#2167602>, @logan-5 wrote:

> Thanks for reverting--I agree that that's the right move at this point.
>
> Pretty much totally out my depth here, and I don't have a way of debugging 
> the Windows issue, so I'm not sure how to proceed. I'm tempted to just let 
> this whole thing rest for now and maybe try again sometime in the future.


I don't really know why this doesn't happen with other warning flags, but I 
think it would be better to add flags like this with add_compile_options rather 
than add_compile_definitions. I imagine that would prevent it from reaching 
rc.exe.

> I didn't realize quite how much I was biting off by volunteering to do this. 
> I want to apologize again for all the trouble.

No worries, these things happen. I'd say a lot of the trouble was caused by our 
build system, and also that lack of a good system to try out patches before 
landing.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D84244/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D84244



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to