aaron.ballman added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp:937
+      return Invalid([&] {
+        Diag(Tok.getLocation(), diag::err_capture_default_first);
+      });
----------------
Would it make sense to provide a fix-it to move the capture default to the 
start of the list automatically, or is that a pain?


================
Comment at: clang/test/Parser/lambda-misplaced-capture-default.cpp:11
+
+  [i, &] {}; // expected-error {{capture default must be first}}
+  [i, = ] {}; // expected-error {{capture default must be first}}
----------------
Can you also add a test showing that `[=, &i]` continues to behave properly (to 
test the `&]` checking logic)?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D83681/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D83681



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to