hokein added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/ComputeDependence.cpp:498
ExprDependence clang::computeDependence(RecoveryExpr *E) {
- // Mark the expression as value- and instantiation- dependent to reuse
- // existing suppressions for dependent code, e.g. avoiding
- // constant-evaluation.
- // FIXME: drop type+value+instantiation once Error is sufficient to suppress
- // bogus dianostics.
+ // RecoveryExpr dependence-bits setting:
+ // - type-dep is set if we don't know about the type (fallback to an opaque
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> I can't really follow this explanation.
> - The first bullet says when, the other two bullets say why
> - the reasons given don't seem to be very principled ones (e.g. suppressing
> constant-evaluation is indeed a nice effect of value-dependency, but I don't
> think it's the *reason* for the value-dependency, rather that the value
> depends on how the error is resolved)
> - I don't understand the connection between the "setting" list and the
> "explanations" one.
>
>
sorry for the confusion. I have refined the doc, hope it is clearer now.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D83215/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D83215
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
