djtodoro marked an inline comment as done.
djtodoro added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/DebugInfo/debugify-each-original.c:16
+// CHECK: Force set function attributes: {{.*}}
+// CHECK-NEXT: Infer set function attributes: {{.*}}
+// CHECK-NEXT: Interprocedural Sparse Conditional Constant Propagation: {{.*}}
----------------
aprantl wrote:
> I think this is still implicitly hardcoding the pass pipeline just through
> the order of CHECK lines. If there were a way to dump the flags Clang is
> passing to LLVM and check that, or get the pass manager to dump its
> configuration, that would be better. I'm not sure if there is such an
> affordance.
I see... It is hard to test it that way, but as far as I can see, it is enough
to test only the `Driver` in situations like this, so I am adding a new test
case and getting rid of this one.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D82547/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D82547
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
