kees added a comment. In D80791#2120503 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D80791#2120503>, @nickdesaulniers wrote:
> Might someone wish to disable PAC/BTI on an individual function, while having > it on for the rest? I guess that would mean you can't call that function > indirectly? It would mean you can't call it _at all_, not just indirectly. :) Which is why I still think the warning is useful. Perhaps don't warn for the functions with the attribute? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D80791/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D80791 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
