njames93 added a comment.

I'm of the idea that rather than having `ClangdTidyOptionsProvider` inherit 
form `tidy::ClangTidyOptionsProvider`, just have it as its own class. We don't 
need the interface offered by clang tidy here. It would solve the `must be 
threadsafe` comment issue as well as reduce the need for some unnecessary code 
in there.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D82002/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D82002



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to