baloghadamsoftware added a comment. In D81718#2096540 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81718#2096540>, @NoQ wrote:
> In D81718#2095965 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81718#2095965>, > @baloghadamsoftware wrote: > > > Your test case unfortunately does not test what you want, because raw > > pointers are not supported yet > > > It tests exactly what i want: the correctness of your code in //this very > patch// that was written to handle //this very case// for which you never > even bothered figuring out the correct solution but you already wrote //a > large amount of code// (including some code in this patch) //with zero test > coverage// to demonstrate correctness of your solution. Did you read my comment? These functions are //not called by all// by your tests! CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D81718/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D81718 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits