hokein abandoned this revision. hokein added a comment. In D81452#2081838 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81452#2081838>, @sammccall wrote:
> Hmm - why? > I thought the idea with the explicit `-frecovery-ast` flag was that we could > turn it on even when it's not stable. > Isn't the idea that one day it will be stable for C, but not yet? oops, right. I think I was highly confused by the misleading results caused by my messed-up patches locally :( Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D81452/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D81452 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
