nemanjai requested changes to this revision. nemanjai added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed.
In D80941#2066931 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D80941#2066931>, @lebedev.ri wrote: > Why not lower it to `@llvm.cttz(and(a, b))`? That's a great idea. Particularly in the back end where this pattern can appear irrespective of the use of the builtins. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D80941/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D80941 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
