Szelethus added a comment. In D80905#2068320 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D80905#2068320>, @NoQ wrote:
> +Nithin because it may be relevant to the smart pointer checker if > inter-checker communication turns out to be necessary (eg., with the move > checker). If checkers rely on one another, weak dependencies aren't the answer, but rather the guarantee strong dependencies grant. Weak dependencies could be useful however if reports from the checker would be hidden by, say, `NullDereferenceChecker`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D80905/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D80905 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
