tambre abandoned this revision. tambre added a comment. In D79800#2058985 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D79800#2058985>, @rsmith wrote:
> Unfortunately, I think this approach basically can't work, because we need to > consider inheriting default arguments from a previous (or subsequent!) > declaration before dropping default arguments preceding a pack. I think we > will instead need to detect this situation when issuing the diagnostic for a > parameter with a default argument followed by a parameter without one, and > will need to make sure that all the parts of Clang that look at default > arguments can cope with them being discontiguous. Thanks for reviewing! Abandoning, as I lack the motivation to implement the proper solution you laid out. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D79800/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D79800 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
