ASDenysPetrov added a comment. @xazax.hun
> I think we should check it on some more projects. We saw vastly different > analyzer behavior on other projects in the past. I completely agree with you. But, unfortunately, vim-proj is the only I could squeeze from that bunch. > I think you should be able to run it on any cmake project that supports > windows by generating compilation database and using scan-build-py (in case > other methods did not work). I'll appreciate if you'd give some of such projects. Another point is that I don't know how to get printed stats from the //scan-build//. > But I wonder how would this compare to a solution that also handles > transitivity. We did not really look into the alternatives yet. I've read an article about Octagons you gave me. The article covers much bigger and more complicated scope, then mine solution. For now I'm not really ready to enlarge it, as it needs a deep investigation. I think for now it can be accepted as an intermadiate proposal. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D78933/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D78933 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
