mattdr added subscribers: rsmith, mattdr.
mattdr added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.def:369
 
+BENIGN_LANGOPT(SpeculativeLoadHardeningEnabled, 1, 0,
+               "Speculative load hardening enabled")
----------------
I've read the description of `LANGOPT`, `COMPATIBLE_LANGOPT`, and 
`BENIGN_LANGOPT` a few times and, though I'm still not //confident//, I 
//think// this should be `LANGOPT`.

A few reasons:
1. We actually expect the SLH setting to be the same throughout a compiled 
binary, so it **shouldn't** differ between modules and the consequences if it 
does are already not well defined
2. Looking through the other `BENIGN_LANGOPT`s, many seem to describe changing 
the boundaries for programs that will be accepted/rejected at parsing, which 
doesn't read on SLH.
3. We're adding this so we can use `__has_feature` to change the code that's 
compiled (e.g. avoiding `asm goto`), so we definitely anticipate cases where 
the setting for this option changes the AST in semantic ways

@rsmith -- can you please check my math?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D79733/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D79733



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to