hubert.reinterpretcast added a comment.

In D79290#2016608 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D79290#2016608>, @v.g.vassilev 
wrote:

> @hubert.reinterpretcast, this patch is part of our internal forks which we 
> would like to put upstream. The author of the previous patch does not have 
> bandwidth to work on it and @reikdas kindly volunteered to take over. I can 
> close the previous one if that's preferable.


Thanks; if @reikdas can try to update the previous patch using the "Commandeer 
Revision" action I described, then that is preferable. If that doesn't work, 
then this patch should have the full set of changes (including the test 
changes) and the previous patch should be closed.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D79290/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D79290



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to