arsenm added a comment. In D78979#2007356 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78979#2007356>, @Anastasia wrote:
> > I'm somewhat confused by the way this is supposed to work, or why a > > separate option exists for OpenCL. The other language flags seem to be > > implemented in the driver, not cc1 like OpenCL. I'm not sure this is > > the right set of flag naming decisions, or if we really need the > > fno-include-default-header cc1 flag. > > Originally we didn't want to include the header by default for 2 reasons: > > 1. Many vendors used their own header. > 2. It takes long time to parse the header. I think this is backwards reasoning. Upstream clang should compile OpenCL as expected by default. If vendors want to use some other header, it should be a downstream responsibility to turn off the default header and include something else CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D78979/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D78979 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
