yaxunl added a comment. In D77954#2005313 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D77954#2005313>, @gribozavr2 wrote:
> Sorry -- this change broke overload resolution for `operator new`, as it is > declared in system headers. I'm reverting the patch. > > $ cat /tmp/in.cu.cc > #define __device__ __attribute__((device)) > void* operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__ size); > __device__ void *operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__ size); > void *x = new int; > $ clang -fsyntax-only --cuda-device-only --target=x86_64-grtev4-linux-gnu > -x cuda -nocudalib -nocudainc -std=gnu++17 /tmp/in.cu.cc > /tmp/in.cu.cc:4:11: error: call to 'operator new' is ambiguous > void *x = new int; > ^ > /tmp/in.cu.cc:2:7: note: candidate function > void* operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__ size); > ^ > /tmp/in.cu.cc:3:18: note: candidate function > __device__ void *operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__ size); > ^ > 1 error generated when compiling for sm_20. > Thanks. Fixed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D78970 Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D77954/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D77954 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
