ping...
On 10/03/16 15:33, Vassil Vassilev wrote:
Would this one more reasonable to commit. As you suggested if the base
type is dependent, create a unique canonical UnaryTransformType with
the canonical form of the base type as its base type and with
DependentTy as its underlying type, then use that canonical dependent
type as the underlying type for your sugared UnaryTransformType.
The attached patch follows the getDecltypeType approach.
--Vassil
On 24/02/16 23:09, Richard Smith wrote:
A UnaryTransformType should itself be a canonical type if its BaseType
is dependent -- that is, its CanonicalType should be QualType(this,
0). It should definitely not be treated as being canonically
equivalent to its BaseType.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Vassil Vassilev
<v.g.vassi...@gmail.com> wrote:
ping...
On 07/01/16 08:09, Vassil Vassilev via cfe-commits wrote:
Hi all,
I am attaching a fix for https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26014
To which type should I tie the canonical type of the unknown
underlying
type? Currently it is tied to its BaseType.
Please review.
--Vassil
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
