aaron.ballman added a comment. In D46317#1988261 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D46317#1988261>, @lebedev.ri wrote:
> IMHO we should proceed with this patch. > There's been several patches recently that seem to not care about > false-positive rate, I don't think that's accurate. We still care about false-positive rates and ask people to report on them when we think there's going to be an issue. That's not to say that we shouldn't proceed with this patch. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D46317/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D46317 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
