rsmith added a comment. In D78134#1985467 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78134#1985467>, @ahatanak wrote:
> In D78134#1982291 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78134#1982291>, @rsmith wrote: > > > So far, the direction the wind is blowing is that attempting to perform an > > lvalue-to-rvalue conversion on an array should be a no-op. (That's weirdly > > different from the behavior on a class, but so be it.) > > > Is this the final decision? Or should I wait until we know for sure that this > is a no-op and doesn't cause an lvalue-to-rvalue conversion? We won't know for months, but it seems reasonable to assume that this will be the final decision. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D78134/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D78134 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
