skalinichev added a comment.
I see. There were some changes recently in the indexing functionality. I'm not
sure whether this change is intended or not, but since it's not your fault and
we already have a lot of tests confirming that clang_CXXMethod_isDeleted is
working as expected (e.g. c-index-test -test-print-type) I think it's ok to
remove this part of the test then
But just in case please open a bug report about skipped deleted methods with
clangIndex.
================
Comment at: tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp:7124
@@ +7123,3 @@
+
+unsigned clang_CXXMethod_isDeleted(CXCursor C) {
+ if (!clang_isDeclaration(C.kind))
----------------
Just occurred to me: what about deleted "not member" functions? Maybe
clang_CXXMethod_isDeleted should be renamed to something like
clang_Cursor_isDeleted and there we can use FunctionDecl::isDeleted()
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15469
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
