mspertus added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang.natvis:25
@@ +24,3 @@
+ <DisplayString Condition="TypeBits.TC==clang::Type::TypeClass::Builtin"
IncludeView="poly">{*(clang::BuiltinType *)this}</DisplayString>
+ <DisplayString Condition="TypeBits.TC==clang::Type::TypeClass::Pointer"
IncludeView="poly">{*(clang::PointerType *)this}</DisplayString>
+ <DisplayString Condition="TypeBits.TC==clang::Type::Attributed"
IncludeView="poly">{*(clang::AttributedType *)this}</DisplayString>
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> If we're handling pointers, perhaps we should also do references similarly?
> Also, perhaps functions as well (bonus points if you can suss out the
> function prototype and display it!)?
I've already written references and can slot into an updated diff. After that,
I plan on adding members of classes, but I'd like to put that in a subsequent
change. Function prototype display is also coming. Does that sound ok?
================
Comment at: clang.natvis:26
@@ +25,3 @@
+ <DisplayString Condition="TypeBits.TC==clang::Type::TypeClass::Pointer"
IncludeView="poly">{*(clang::PointerType *)this}</DisplayString>
+ <DisplayString
Condition="TypeBits.TC==clang::Type::TypeClass::LValueReference"
IncludeView="poly">{*(clang::LValueReferenceType *)this}</DisplayString>
+ <DisplayString
Condition="TypeBits.TC==clang::Type::TypeClass::RValueReference"
IncludeView="poly">{*(clang::RValueReferenceType *)this}</DisplayString>
----------------
Fixed
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18163
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
