hokein added a comment. In D77395#1972666 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D77395#1972666>, @sammccall wrote:
> the `attempt to use a deleted function` diagnostic is a bit spammy, because > the default-constructor and destructor are often deleted for similar reasons. > But I guess this is probably OK, unless you can see an easy way to suppress > it. didn't see a trivial way to suppress this diagnostic, as we don't have enough information to distinguish the VarDecl (valid bit is true, no init-expr) has an ill-formed default initialization. I think we could build a recovery-expr and use it as the init-expr for the VarDecl, and suppress this diagnostic. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D77395/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D77395 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
