erik.pilkington added a comment. What do you think about using the block type instead of a hash? That should be stable across compiler versions, changes to the block body, and changes to referenced declarations. You'd still have to number blocks of the same type within the same function, but that should be a much smaller problem. It'd also allow demanglers to provide more information about the symbol, e.g. a demangler could print:
`block invocation function for block of type void (^)(int) in main` As opposed to what it prints today, which doesn't really tell you much about which block you're looking at: `block invocation function for block in main`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74813/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74813 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
