vingeldal added a comment. After looking more closely at the code I think the issue is within hasLocalStorage() which is called in hasGlobalStorage(). My expectation would be that anything inside of function scope would be considered local but I'm not very certain. Any thoughts on whether hasLocalStorage() should be modified or if I should change the check and use some more ad-hoc implementation, instead of hasGlobalStorage(), to determine if the variable is local or global?
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D70265/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D70265 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
