martong accepted this revision. martong added a comment. LGTM and thanks!
In D77012#1948550 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D77012#1948550>, @NoQ wrote: > Thanks! > > @Szelethus can we make this checker depend on undefined value checker > (probably CallAndMessage) so that uninitialized arguments were handled first? > In fact, can we make a silent assumption that everything depends on `core`? > If so we could eliminate all checks for undefined values in PreStmt and > PreCall. +1, we should really do that. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D77012/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D77012 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
