On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 8:49 PM Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 17:07, David Blaikie via cfe-commits <
> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 3:12 PM Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odw...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure, but I do see that the call stack contains a call to
>>>
>>> bool llvm::function_ref<bool (clang::Expr*&,
>>> bool)>::callback_fn<llvm::function_ref<bool (clang::Expr*&, bool)>
>>> const>(long, clang::Expr*&, bool)
>>>
>>> Notice that this is function_ref::callback_fn<T> instantiated with
>>> T=function_ref itself; i.e., we do have a function_ref to a function_ref.
>>> This is the thing I was saying can happen (in my "lamb/sheep" example) but
>>> which I thought should never happen in this codepath.
>>> Here's function_ref's copy constructor:
>>>
>>>
>>> template <typename Callable>
>>>
>>> function_ref(Callable &&callable,
>>>
>>>
>>> std::enable_if_t<!std::is_same<std::remove_reference_t<Callable>,
>>>
>>> function_ref>::value> * =
>>> nullptr)
>>>
>>> : callback(callback_fn<typename
>>> std::remove_reference<Callable>::type>),
>>>
>>> callable(reinterpret_cast<intptr_t>(&callable)) {}
>>>
>>>
>>> I believe that it should be using std::remove_cvref_t, not
>>> std::remove_reference_t, so as not to conflict with the compiler's
>>> implicitly generated copy constructor.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>
>> Yep, looks like you're on to something here - I still don't understand
>> why calling that function rather than the real trivial copy ctor would be
>> problematic,
>>
>
> OK, so: we're calling the wrong constructor for the inner capture due to
> the implicit 'const' that's added because the outer lambda is not mutable
> (and the fix suggested by Arthur is the right one: we should be using
> remove_cvref_t here not remove_reference_t -- or rather
> std::remove_cv_t<std::remove_reference_t<Callable>>, since we don't require
> C++20 yet). And this means that copying a function_ref from a *const*
> function_ref gives you a new function_ref that refers to the old one, not a
> new function_ref that refers to the same function the old one did. In
> particular, this happens when copying a lambda that captures a function_ref
> by value.
>
I was only able to hit this with a const rvalue reference - is that
expected, or did I overcomplicate my test case in some way? (this: "const
function_ref<T> a; function_ref<T> b = a;" didn't hit the converting ctor,
it ran the copy ctor as desired. I had to "function_ref<T> b =
static_cast<const function_ref<T> &&>(a);" to tickle it)
Committed the fix/test in cbce88dd3a9ea7161da3c57749cf03873dc7ea79 - open
to suggestions on simplification of the test case if there is some. Oh, I
might've named the new test case a bit poorly... didn't go back and edit
that after it got more baked.
>
> The next part of the puzzle is that llvm::any_of takes its callback by
> value and passes it by value to std::any_of. And inside any_of, in
> libstdc++, the predicate is passed through __pred_iter (
> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/include/bits/predefined_ops.h#L323)
> before being used. That results in building a function_ref referring to
> part of the function parameter in __pred_iter, whose lifetime ends before
> we call it.
>
> With libc++, the predicate is not copied around inside any_of, which is
> why this was only failing on some buildbots.
>
> but I managed to reproduce this locally with GCC 7.5 (seems to be an issue
>> with the 7 series - the buildbot used 7.3) & if I capture by value in both
>> outer and inner lambdas it reproduces, but if I mark the outer lambda as
>> mutable it succeeds (because this would remove the const & not trip over
>> the SFINAE issue you pointed out)...
>>
>> Investigation continues.
>>
>> - Dave
>>
>>
>>> –Arthur
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:08 PM David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Richard - could you help try to diagnose what's happening here?
>>>>
>>>> I reverted this patch in:
>>>> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0d0b90105f92f6cd9cc7004d565834f4429183fb
>>>> But that did actually cause buildbot failures, such as these ones:
>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux-multistage/builds/24491
>>>> eg:
>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux-multistage/builds/24491/steps/ninja%20check%201/logs/FAIL%3A%20Clang%3A%3Adeclare_variant_mixed_codegen.cpp
>>>> I "fixed" these failures blind by reapplying part of this original
>>>> commit (the lambda capture by reference rather than by value):
>>>> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2ec59a0a40f4ec02e6b2dbe5f12261959c191aa9
>>>>
>>>> I've stared at this a fair bit and can't spot any undefined behavior,
>>>> but I guess it's probably in there somewhere - and I'm worried that this
>>>> fix is blind, not fully justified & might be hiding some latent issues.
>>>>
>>>> The full buildbot example failure quoted here in case it times out/gets
>>>> deleted on the buildbot itself:
>>>>
>>>> ******************** TEST 'Clang ::
>>>> OpenMP/declare_variant_mixed_codegen.cpp' FAILED ********************
>>>> Script:
>>>> --
>>>> : 'RUN: at line 1';
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang
>>>> -cc1 -internal-isystem
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/lib/clang/11.0.0/include
>>>> -nostdsysteminc -verify -fopenmp -x c++ -triple x86_64-unknown-linux
>>>> -emit-llvm
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/llvm/clang/test/OpenMP/declare_variant_mixed_codegen.cpp
>>>> -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -o - -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope |
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/FileCheck
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/llvm/clang/test/OpenMP/declare_variant_mixed_codegen.cpp
>>>> : 'RUN: at line 2';
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang
>>>> -cc1 -internal-isystem
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/lib/clang/11.0.0/include
>>>> -nostdsysteminc -fopenmp -x c++ -std=c++11 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux
>>>> -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -emit-pch -o
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/tools/clang/test/OpenMP/Output/declare_variant_mixed_codegen.cpp.tmp
>>>> -fopenmp-version=50
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/llvm/clang/test/OpenMP/declare_variant_mixed_codegen.cpp
>>>> : 'RUN: at line 3';
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang
>>>> -cc1 -internal-isystem
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/lib/clang/11.0.0/include
>>>> -nostdsysteminc -fopenmp -x c++ -triple x86_64-unknown-linux -fexceptions
>>>> -fcxx-exceptions -std=c++11 -include-pch
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/tools/clang/test/OpenMP/Output/declare_variant_mixed_codegen.cpp.tmp
>>>> -verify
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/llvm/clang/test/OpenMP/declare_variant_mixed_codegen.cpp
>>>> -emit-llvm -o - -fopenmp-version=50 |
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/FileCheck
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/llvm/clang/test/OpenMP/declare_variant_mixed_codegen.cpp
>>>> --
>>>> Exit Code: 2
>>>>
>>>> Command Output (stderr):
>>>> --
>>>> Stack dump:
>>>> 0. Program arguments:
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang
>>>> -cc1 -internal-isystem
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/lib/clang/11.0.0/include
>>>> -nostdsysteminc -verify -fopenmp -x c++ -triple x86_64-unknown-linux
>>>> -emit-llvm
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/llvm/clang/test/OpenMP/declare_variant_mixed_codegen.cpp
>>>> -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -o - -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope
>>>> 1.
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/llvm/clang/test/OpenMP/declare_variant_mixed_codegen.cpp:38:92:
>>>> at annotation token
>>>> #0 0x0000000012e3ebd0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&)
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x12e3ebd0)
>>>> #1 0x0000000012e3ece8 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*)
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x12e3ece8)
>>>> #2 0x0000000012e3c4e0 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers()
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x12e3c4e0)
>>>> #3 0x0000000012e3d3a4 SignalHandler(int)
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x12e3d3a4)
>>>> #4 0x00007fffb50f04d8 (linux-vdso64.so.1+0x4d8)
>>>> #5 0x0000000014df41ac bool llvm::function_ref<bool (clang::Expr*&,
>>>> bool)>::callback_fn<llvm::function_ref<bool (clang::Expr*&, bool)>
>>>> const>(long, clang::Expr*&, bool)
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x14df41ac)
>>>> #6 0x00007fffff5e7fd0
>>>> #7 0x0000000014e2bfd0 clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSelector*
>>>> std::__find_if<clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSelector*,
>>>> __gnu_cxx::__ops::_Iter_pred<clang::OMPTraitInfo::anyScoreOrCondition(llvm::function_ref<bool
>>>> (clang::Expr*&,
>>>> bool)>)::'lambda'(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet&)::operator()(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet&)
>>>> const::'lambda'(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSelector&)>
>>>> >(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSelector*,
>>>> clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSelector*,
>>>> __gnu_cxx::__ops::_Iter_pred<clang::OMPTraitInfo::anyScoreOrCondition(llvm::function_ref<bool
>>>> (clang::Expr*&,
>>>> bool)>)::'lambda'(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet&)::operator()(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet&)
>>>> const::'lambda'(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSelector&)>,
>>>> std::random_access_iterator_tag)
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x14e2bfd0)
>>>> #8 0x0000000014e2c118 bool
>>>> llvm::any_of<llvm::SmallVector<clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSelector, 4u>&,
>>>> clang::OMPTraitInfo::anyScoreOrCondition(llvm::function_ref<bool
>>>> (clang::Expr*&,
>>>> bool)>)::'lambda'(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet&)::operator()(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet&)
>>>> const::'lambda'(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSelector&)>(llvm::SmallVector<clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSelector,
>>>> 4u>&, clang::OMPTraitInfo::anyScoreOrCondition(llvm::function_ref<bool
>>>> (clang::Expr*&,
>>>> bool)>)::'lambda'(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet&)::operator()(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet&)
>>>> const::'lambda'(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSelector&)) (.isra.3726)
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x14e2c118)
>>>> #9 0x0000000014e2c2a4 clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet*
>>>> std::__find_if<clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet*,
>>>> __gnu_cxx::__ops::_Iter_pred<clang::OMPTraitInfo::anyScoreOrCondition(llvm::function_ref<bool
>>>> (clang::Expr*&, bool)>)::'lambda'(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet&)>
>>>> >(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet*, clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet*,
>>>> __gnu_cxx::__ops::_Iter_pred<clang::OMPTraitInfo::anyScoreOrCondition(llvm::function_ref<bool
>>>> (clang::Expr*&, bool)>)::'lambda'(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet&)>,
>>>> std::random_access_iterator_tag)
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x14e2c2a4)
>>>> #10 0x0000000014e2c368 bool
>>>> llvm::any_of<llvm::SmallVector<clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet, 4u>&,
>>>> clang::OMPTraitInfo::anyScoreOrCondition(llvm::function_ref<bool
>>>> (clang::Expr*&,
>>>> bool)>)::'lambda'(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet&)>(llvm::SmallVector<clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet,
>>>> 4u>&, clang::OMPTraitInfo::anyScoreOrCondition(llvm::function_ref<bool
>>>> (clang::Expr*&, bool)>)::'lambda'(clang::OMPTraitInfo::OMPTraitSet&))
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x14e2c368)
>>>> #11 0x0000000014e2cc38
>>>> clang::Sema::checkOpenMPDeclareVariantFunction(clang::OpaquePtr<clang::DeclGroupRef>,
>>>> clang::Expr*, clang::OMPTraitInfo&, clang::SourceRange)
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x14e2cc38)
>>>> #12 0x00000000148fc550
>>>> clang::Parser::ParseOMPDeclareVariantClauses(clang::OpaquePtr<clang::DeclGroupRef>,
>>>> llvm::SmallVector<clang::Token, 4u>&, clang::SourceLocation)
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x148fc550)
>>>> #13 0x00000000148fd354
>>>> clang::Parser::ParseOpenMPDeclarativeDirectiveWithExtDecl(clang::AccessSpecifier&,
>>>> clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, bool, clang::TypeSpecifierType,
>>>> clang::Decl*)
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x148fd354)
>>>> #14 0x00000000148723c4
>>>> clang::Parser::ParseExternalDeclaration(clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&,
>>>> clang::ParsingDeclSpec*)
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x148723c4)
>>>> #15 0x000000001487395c
>>>> clang::Parser::ParseTopLevelDecl(clang::OpaquePtr<clang::DeclGroupRef>&,
>>>> bool)
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x1487395c)
>>>> #16 0x0000000014866a20 clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool)
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x14866a20)
>>>> #17 0x00000000136f6298 clang::ASTFrontendAction::ExecuteAction()
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x136f6298)
>>>> #18 0x0000000013de8220 clang::CodeGenAction::ExecuteAction()
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x13de8220)
>>>> #19 0x00000000136fcc64 clang::FrontendAction::Execute()
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x136fcc64)
>>>> #20 0x00000000136b71c0
>>>> clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&)
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x136b71c0)
>>>> #21 0x00000000137c9794
>>>> clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*)
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x137c9794)
>>>> #22 0x00000000109674cc cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char
>>>> const*, void*)
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x109674cc)
>>>> #23 0x00000000109635b8 ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char
>>>> const*>&)
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x109635b8)
>>>> #24 0x00000000108b838c main
>>>> (/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/clang+0x108b838c)
>>>> #25 0x00007fffb4a55b10 generic_start_main.isra.0
>>>> (/lib64/power8/libc.so.6+0x45b10)
>>>> #26 0x00007fffb4a55d38 __libc_start_main
>>>> (/lib64/power8/libc.so.6+0x45d38)
>>>> FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty.
>>>> FileCheck command line:
>>>>
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/stage1/bin/FileCheck
>>>> /home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64be-multistage/llvm/clang/test/OpenMP/declare_variant_mixed_codegen.cpp
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> ********************
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 7:38 PM David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Reverted in 0d0b90105f92f6cd9cc7004d565834f4429183fb & I'll see what
>>>>> happens with the buildbots.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 5:47 PM Johannes Doerfert <
>>>>> johan...@jdoerfert.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apologies for the confusion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wrote the commit message after looking into this and I though the
>>>>>> issue was related to the capture by copy in the inner llvm::any_of and
>>>>>> the reuse in the outer. Looking back at the code I cannot say anymore
>>>>>> how I got that impression.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you think the reference is problematic, I'm totally happy to remove
>>>>>> it. If the windows bots (or any other ones) don't like it we need to
>>>>>> investigate why. As mentioned, I had a problem recreating the problem
>>>>>> locally before.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Johannes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/22/20 1:37 PM, Arthur O'Dwyer wrote:
>>>>>> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:48 PM David Blaikie via cfe-commits <
>>>>>> > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 10:40 AM Johannes Doerfert
>>>>>> <johan...@jdoerfert.de>
>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>> Some buildbots, I think only Windows buildbots for some reason,
>>>>>> crashed
>>>>>> >>> in this function.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> The reason, as described, is that an `llvm::function_ref` cannot
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> >>> copied and then reused. It just happened to work on almost all
>>>>>> >>> configurations.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> That doesn't seem to be accurate, or if it is there's a lot of
>>>>>> mistakes in
>>>>>> >> the codebase - basically every function_ref parameter I can see
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> LLVM is
>>>>>> >> passing by value, not by const ref. The implementation of
>>>>>> >> llvm::function_ref looks quite copyable so long as it doesn't
>>>>>> outlive the
>>>>>> >> functor it is pointing to.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > David is correct. llvm::function_ref, like std::reference_wrapper,
>>>>>> is a
>>>>>> > trivially copyable type, and it's designed to be copied.
>>>>>> > Like string_view and reference_wrapper, function_ref is designed
>>>>>> to be
>>>>>> > passed by value. Redundantly passing function_ref *again by
>>>>>> reference* is a
>>>>>> > code smell.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I've also checked the code here, and it looks like there are only
>>>>>> two
>>>>>> > callers of `anyScoreOrCondition` — both in Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp —
>>>>>> and they
>>>>>> > are both fine. FWIW, I would recommend reverting Johannes' change
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> > seeing if those Windows buildbots are still unhappy (and if so,
>>>>>> why).
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Btw, one failure mode I'm aware of, but which I believe is NOT
>>>>>> relevant in
>>>>>> > Johannes' case, is that `function_ref`'s converting constructor
>>>>>> behaves
>>>>>> > differently from its copy constructor.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > int main()
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > {
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > auto lamb = [](){ return 42; };
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > auto sheep = [](){ return 43; };
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > llvm::function_ref<int()> one = lamb;
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > llvm::function_ref<int()> twoA = one; // twoA refers to lamb
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > llvm::function_ref<short()> twoB = one; // twoB refers to one
>>>>>> which
>>>>>> > refers to lamb
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > one = sheep;
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > assert(twoA() == 42); // twoA refers to lamb
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > assert(twoB() == 43); // twoB refers to one which refers to
>>>>>> sheep
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > }
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > That is, if you have a function that takes a parameter of type
>>>>>> > function_ref<A>, and someone passes it an argument of type
>>>>>> function_ref<B>,
>>>>>> > then inside the function your parameter will be referring to that
>>>>>> argument
>>>>>> > itself instead of to its referent.
>>>>>> > However, in Johannes' particular case, we have no function_refs
>>>>>> referring
>>>>>> > to other function_refs. We just make a lambda and take a
>>>>>> function_ref to
>>>>>> > it, the end. So I'm pretty sure this pitfall is irrelevant.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > –Arthur
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
