rnk accepted this revision. rnk added a reviewer: rnk. rnk added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D18071#373687, @pcc wrote: > Done (this also affects `_purecall` in the MS ABI; I don't think this change > should break anything there, but someone working on that might want to > comment). Since this patch is now specific to virtual tables anyway, I've > incorporated another relevant change, which is to mark virtual function > declarations as `unnamed_addr`. That shouldn't matter. Virtual member functions are wrapped with a thunk, so comparisons won't actually involve pointers to __purecall. http://reviews.llvm.org/D18071 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
