etienneb added a comment.
> $ du -cksh bin/clang-tidy.exe bin/clang.exe > 21M bin/clang-tidy.exe > 47M bin/clang.exe > 68M total This is a huge difference. I didn't expect dependencies to bring so much code. I'm not a fan of having an empty statement and increasing false positives ratio. Would it be possible to skip whole declarations with asm-stm, and flag them as "ignored / not parsable"? > Also, should we do this for all Clang tools? I would prefer a generic solution for every tools. I saw different cases where developers fix this issue differently. > where the one who builds the binary knows for sure that it won't be used for > MS targets We could gate this code under a define. I'm not a fan of define, but it seems to be a compromise for the size. Something like: LIBTOOLING_ENABLE_INLINE_ASM_PARSER If we decide to pursue that direction, then it should probably be for every tools. http://reviews.llvm.org/D17981 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
