NoQ accepted this revision.
NoQ added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

I like this! Please address the remaining nits^^



================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp:102
+  /// Given a range, should the argument stay inside or outside this range?
+  enum RangeKind { OutOfRange, WithinRange };
 
----------------
baloghadamsoftware wrote:
> I would move this into the class to encapsulate the values instead of 
> contaminating namespace `ento`.
It's checker-local anyway and i suspect we write these a lot in the summaries, 
so let's keep it in the global scope.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D74973/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D74973



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to