[+Richard] ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Artem Belevich" <t...@google.com> > To: reviews+d18051+public+fb9c7f3f37ff8...@reviews.llvm.org > Cc: "Justin Lebar" <jle...@google.com>, "Jingyue Wu" > <jing...@google.com>, "Hal Finkel" <hfin...@anl.gov>, "cfe-commits" > <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 6:38:21 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH] D18051: [CUDA] Provide CUDA's vector types > implemented using clang's vector extension. > There were ambiguities in overload resolution between vector types > and their base types. I.e. if I had > void foo(int); > void foo(int3); > then call foo(3) was ambiguous. > It wasn't clear whether this extension is supposed to work in C++ at > all. I'm pretty sure that the vector types are supposed to work in C++, and they have different manglings, so that behavior seems like either bug or a missing desirable feature. Richard, what do you think? Thanks again, Hal > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Hal Finkel < hfin...@anl.gov > > wrote: > > hfinkel added a subscriber: hfinkel. > > > hfinkel added a comment. > > > In http://reviews.llvm.org/D18051#372490 , @tra wrote: > > > > Ugh. Found more problems with using vector types in C++. > > > Abandoning > > > the idea. > > > I'm curious, what problems? > > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D18051 > > -- > --Artem Belevich -- Hal Finkel Assistant Computational Scientist Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
