aaronpuchert added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Sema/warn-strict-prototypes.c:11
+// function definition with 0 params, no prototype.
+void foo1() {} // expected-warning {{this old-style function definition is not
preceded by a prototype}}
+// function definition with 0 params, prototype.
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> I'd like a few more test cases:
> ```
> // Test that a non-prototyped definition with no preceding prototype whines
> about lacking a preceding prototype
> void fooN() {} // expected-warning {{this old-style function definition is
> not preceded by a prototype}}
>
> // Test that an existing declaration with no prototype still warns that a
> corresponding definition with a type list is still not preceded by a
> prototype.
> void fooN1(); // expected-warning {{this function declaration is not a
> prototype}}
> void fooN1(void) {} // expected-warning {{this old-style function definition
> is not preceded by a prototype}}
> ```
I guess we want the warning only on the declaration of `fooN1`, not the
definition? Because that's not an old-style function definition.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66919/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66919
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
