jsji added a comment. In D74436#1875320 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D74436#1875320>, @mibintc wrote:
> @jsji Will your backend tolerate -ffp-contract=on if optimizations are not > disabled, e.g. -O2? We are proposing that the default floating point model > be -ffp-model=precise, and with precise model, the ffp-contract=on. However > you are right we don't want the frontend to create FMA when optimizations are > disabled -O0 We normally default to `-ffp-contract=on ` only for -O3 and above (for legacy compilers XL/gcc on PowerPC). But yes, I think we are OK to accept `-ffp-contract=on` (not `-ffp-contract=fast`) at -O2 if there are strong justifications to do so on clang. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74436/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74436 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits