aganea added a comment. In D74447#1872043 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D74447#1872043>, @thakis wrote:
> Isn't a better approach to only do in-process cc1 if there's just one TU? One of the reasons of the in-process cc1 was the debuggability. If we can compile several TUs in-process, why not doing it? As for build times, we found that even with the clean up, in-process+clean-up is faster than out-of-process+disable-free. That is, on Windows and in the context of the `llvm-buildozer` app I've presented at the LLVM conf., where all the TUs for a project are compiled in the same process (meaning there's a clean up after each TU). Any other issues you were seeing with this current approach? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74447/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74447 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
