bader marked 3 inline comments as done.
bader added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp:2548
+ Opts.SYCL = Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fsycl, options::OPT_fno_sycl, false);
+ Opts.SYCLIsDevice = Args.hasArg(options::OPT_fsycl_is_device);
+ if (Opts.SYCL || Opts.SYCLIsDevice) {
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> bader wrote:
> > ABataev wrote:
> > > This option also must be controlled by `-fsycl`:
> > > ```
> > > Opts.SYCLIsDevice = Opts.SYCL &&
> > > Args.hasArg(options::OPT_fsycl_is_device);
> > >
> > > ```
> > Does it really has to? This logic is already present in the driver and it
> > makes front-end tests verbose `%clang_cc1 -fsycl -fsycl-is-device`.
> > Can `-fsycl-is-device` imply `-fsycl`?
> > Looking how CUDA/OpenMP options are handled, not all of them are processed
> > using this pattern.
> In general, this is how we handle it in OpenMP. Cuda works differently,
> because it has its own kind of files (.cu) and Cuda is triggered by the
> language switch (-x cu). Seems to me, you're using something close to OpenMP
> model, no? Or do you want to define your own language kind just like Cuda?
I applied you suggest, although I don't fully understand the need of using two
options instead of two. I would prefer having following code:
```
Opts.SYCLIsDevice = Args.hasArg(options::OPT_fsycl_is_device);
Opts.SYCL = Args.hasArg(options::OPT_fsycl) || Opts.SYCLIsDevice; //
-fsycl-is-device enable SYCL mode as well
```
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72857/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72857
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
