john.brawn marked 2 inline comments as done.
john.brawn added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/ParsedAttr.cpp:141
 
+static ParsedAttrInfo DefaultParsedAttrInfo;
 static const ParsedAttrInfo &getInfo(const ParsedAttr &A) {
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> Might as well lower this variable into the function -- no real need for it to 
> have file scope.
Sure.


================
Comment at: clang/utils/TableGen/ClangAttrEmitter.cpp:3400
 
-static std::string GenerateAppertainsTo(const Record &Attr, raw_ostream &OS) {
+static void GenerateAppertainsTo(const Record &Attr, raw_ostream &SS,
+                                 raw_ostream &OS) {
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> erichkeane wrote:
> > john.brawn wrote:
> > > erichkeane wrote:
> > > > Why does this take SS AND OS.  What is the difference here?  Does this 
> > > > actually use OS anymore?
> > > It's because of GenerateCustomAppertainsTo.  That generates a function 
> > > that expects to be at file scope (because emitAttributeMatchRules re-uses 
> > > the same function), but at the time GenerateAppertainsTo is called SS is 
> > > in the middle of the ParsedAttrInfo. Previously both the function that 
> > > GenerateCustomAppertainsTo generates and that this file generates would 
> > > be at file scope, so both were written to OS.
> > Thanks!
> I think the stream parameter names should be a bit more descriptive here (and 
> perhaps some comments on the function would be a good idea as well). Perhaps 
> `FileScopeStream` and `LexicalScopeStream`?
Actually, looking at this again there's no reason we can't generate the 
CustomApperatinsTo functions in a loop at the start of 
EmitClangAttrParsedAttrImpl. That way everything can just go to a single output 
stream and we don't have this problem. I'll rearrange things to do that instead.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D31337/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D31337



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to