rjmccall added a comment. In D72742#1854594 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D72742#1854594>, @emilio wrote:
> Could anyone update me with how do they want me to proceed here? Is fixing > the coercions enough to allow this to land? Do I need to make it > target-specific? It needs to be target-specific. > If so, which targets should keep the current behavior? At least Darwin and PS4, maybe some others. BSD? > Another slightly more backwards-compatible alternative (though hacky, > arguably) is to just not use the zext for optimization purposes in the > backend. This would be simpler and should keep clang always sign-extending on > the caller too, for now. We could then after a while, switch to this > approach. D71178 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71178> contains such a patch, for > comparison. It wouldn't be unreasonable to have a way to request this behavior, but I'm not sure about switching to it for all `zext` / `sext`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D72742/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D72742 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
