Anastasia added a comment. In D73360#1852147 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D73360#1852147>, @rjmccall wrote:
> If it's reasonable to persist the failure kind, that would probably be good, > but it might be a lot of work. I have looked at it earlier and it indeed affects a lot of Sema in C++ mode. Besides amount of work I am not sure I understand the flow enough to come up with a good approach. Maybe we can finalize this review first to fix the regression. Because I would like it to be ported to the release 10 branch too. Then I can spend some time to see if I can come up with something better for the diagnostic too. :) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D73360/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D73360 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
