Jac1494 added a comment. In D71451#1817334 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71451#1817334>, @aprantl wrote:
> In D71451#1816269 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71451#1816269>, @Jac1494 wrote: > > > ping > > > I'd be curious to the answer to David's questions. If the size increase is > because of unused extern variables coming in from libc or something then it > doesn't seem worth the cost. @aprantl now size of clang is same with this change (D71451 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71451> and D71599 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71599>). CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71451/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71451 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
