gribozavr2 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/UseAfterMoveCheck.cpp:387
+ unless(inDecltypeOrTemplateArg()),
+ unless(hasAncestor(cxxNoexceptExpr())))
.bind("call-move");
----------------
Quuxplusone wrote:
> What about `sizeof`, `alignof`, `requires`, `typeid`, and other such
> unevaluated contexts? Shouldn't there be a common way to spell "this
> expression is unevaluated"? (I don't know if there is or not.)
+1 to adding handling and tests for other unevaluated contexts.
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone-use-after-move.cpp:1276
+namespace PR44667 {
+#define REQUIRE(expr) (void)(expr);
+struct S {};
----------------
Is the macro a necessary part of this test? If not, can it be removed?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D73441/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D73441
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
