nickdesaulniers added a comment. In D72222#1836687 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D72222#1836687>, @MaskRay wrote:
> (I really dislike how the feature was developed on the GCC side. Yet another > Linux-kernel specific GCC option when there are already 4 existing options > for the same feature) Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but please always have respect for the competition, as a representative of the company and LLVM community you represent, as well as my friend. It should be clear why that's important and why I won't tolerate anything less. If you still disagree, I'm happy to talk more about it privately. Can you enumerate the 4 existing options? If we do already have an existing tool in our toolbox, it would be good to consider their strengths and limitations before building a new tool. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D72222/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D72222 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
