Does this change any behavior? (missing test case?) On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: akirtzidis > Date: Mon Feb 29 20:46:32 2016 > New Revision: 262290 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=262290&view=rev > Log: > [index] Fix issue where data visitation was disabled with C++ operator > call expressions, during indexing. > > Modified: > cfe/trunk/lib/Index/IndexBody.cpp > > Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Index/IndexBody.cpp > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Index/IndexBody.cpp?rev=262290&r1=262289&r2=262290&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > --- cfe/trunk/lib/Index/IndexBody.cpp (original) > +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Index/IndexBody.cpp Mon Feb 29 20:46:32 2016 > @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ public: > DataRecursionQueue *Q = nullptr) { > if (E->getOperatorLoc().isInvalid()) > return true; // implicit. > - return base::TraverseCXXOperatorCallExpr(E); > + return base::TraverseCXXOperatorCallExpr(E, Q); > } > > bool VisitDeclStmt(DeclStmt *S) { > @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ public: > > auto visitForm = [&](InitListExpr *Form) { > for (Stmt *SubStmt : Form->children()) { > - if (!TraverseStmt(SubStmt)) > + if (!TraverseStmt(SubStmt, Q)) > return false; > } > return true; > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
