whisperity added a comment. I am a little bit conflicted about the //Severity// column. While I know our people put a great deal of effort into keeping this classification sane, what was put into CodeChecker is, at the end of the day, a pretty arbitrary classification.
I think RSTs support comments, right? Maybe it should be indicated in the code (as a comment only) where the severity was taken from, so if someone comes up with a reason to change a checker's severity, they could also submit a patch to CodeChecker's knowledge-base. Maybe not //just// in the code comment, but also in the markup that gets rendered for the users, too? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D36051/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D36051 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
