epastor added a comment. In D71677#1790458 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71677#1790458>, @rnk wrote:
> Where is {0:P} actually documented? I don't see it in LangRef, but I do see > it in the code. https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#asm-template-argument-modifiers, under X86; specifically documented to be used on the operands of `call` instructions. ================ Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp:2871 + // differently when referenced in MS-style inline assembly. + if (Name.startswith("call") || Name.startswith("lcall")) { + for (size_t i = 1; i < Operands.size(); ++i) { ---------------- rnk wrote: > I'm trying to think of other edge cases where we'd want the same treatment. > In theory, we'd want to do this for every control flow instruction that takes > a PC-relative operand, jmp, jcc, jecxz, that might be all. You know, it > actually seems reasonable to set up a naked function that contains an asm > blob which conditionally branches to another function, so I guess we should > support it. In that case, maybe this should be named something like > "isBranchTarget" instead of isCallTarget. That would be a valid option, but currently the "P" modifier is documented for LLVM as to-be-used on the operands of `call` instructions. [[ https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html#x86Operandmodifiers | GNU as ]]) adds it more generally to be applied to functions - and occasionally constants, if you need a constant to avoid all syntax-specific prefixes. We could use this for any branch target operand... but we'd need to restrict it to apply only to the specific PC-relative operand, which I think means augmenting the X86 target tables to annotate which operands of which instructions are PC-relative? Also, I'm not sure if that would break pre-existing code in enough cases to be worrying. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71677/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71677 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits